news contact map home
guidelines interventions hi lo evac studies stories cost

VAP Incidence and Mortality

  • Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the second most common nosocomial infection in the United States. It is estimated to occur in 9% to 25% of ICU patients.1-3
  • VAP is associated with increasing ICU stays by up to 22 days and hospital stays by up to 25 days.4
  • Mortality that is directly attributable to VAP is estimated to be as high as 27.1%.5

Associated Cost of VAP

  • VAP is associated with more than $40,000 in increased hospital costs per patient and may be higher in certain types of patient care units.3
  • A study in a shock trauma ICU found that VAP costs $57,000 per occurrence.6

Pathogenesis and Risk Factors

  • Aspiration of oral and/or gastric secretions is the primary route of bacterial entry into the lungs and is believed to be a primary factor in the development of VAP.
  • Each day on mechanical ventilation increases patient risk for VAP by 1% to 3%.7
  • Independent predictors of VAP include burns, trauma, central nervous system disease, respiratory disease, cardiac disease, mechanical ventilation in the previous 24 hours, witnessed aspiration and paralytic agents.7

Continuous Aspiration of Subglottic Secretions

  • Continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions (CASS) removes oral and/or gastric secretions from above the endotracheal tube cuff before they can be aspirated. CASS must be done with a specialized endotracheal tube with a separate dorsal suction lumen.
  • Five randomized, controlled studies examined the efficacy of CASS in reducing VAP. Their findings are summarized in the chart below.
Author/Date Patient Profile # of pts VAP Rate Study Vap Rate Control % Reduction
Smulders 20028 Med/Surg ICU
patients expected to
be ventilated >72 hrs
150 9.2 22.5 59%
Bo 20029 Surgical ICU
patients expected to
be ventilated >72 hrs
68 23% (percent incidence) 45% (percent incidence) 48%
Kollef 199910 Cardio-Thoracic ICU patients (average
ventilation 1.5 days)
343 34.5 43.2 Not statistically significant
Valles 199511 Med/Surg ICU
patients expected to
be ventilated >72 hrs
190 19.9 39.6 50%
Mahul 199212 Med/Surg ICU
patients expected to
be ventilated >72 hrs
145 13% (percent incidence) 29% (percent incidence) 55%

Outcome Improvements with CASS

  • A meta-analysis of the five studies found that, in patients expected to be ventilated >72 hours, continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions:
    • Reduced the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia by nearly half
    • Reduced ICU length of stay by 3 days
    • Reduced duration of mechanical ventilation by 2 days
    • Delayed the onset of VAP by 6.9 days13

Guidelines and Recommendations

  • Based on the available evidence, the following organizations recommend use of CASS to reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia:
    • American Thoracic Society/ Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) – Level I14
    • Centers for Disease Control (CDC) – Category II15
    • American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN)16
    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)17

References

  1. Ibrahim EH, Tracy L, Hill C, et al. The occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a community hospital: risk factors and clinical outcomes. Chest. 2001;120:555-561.
  2. Craven DE, Steger KA. Nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated adult patients: epidemiology and prevention in 1996. Semin Respir Infect. 1996;11:32-53.
  3. Rello J, Ollendorf DA, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database. Chest. 2002;122:2115-2121.
  4. Warren D, Shukla S, Olson M, et al. Outcome and attributable cost of ventilator-associated pneumonia among intensive care unit patients in a suburban medical center. Critical Care Medicine. 2003;31:1312-1317.
  5. Fagon JY, Chastre J, et al. Nosocomial Pneumonia in Ventilated Patients: A Cohort Study Evaluating Attributable Mortality and Hospital Stay. The American Journal of Medicine. 1993;94:281-288.
  6. Cocanour C, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Peninger M, et al. Cost of a ventilator-associated pneumonia in a shock trauma intensive care unit. Surgical Infections. 2005;6:65-72.
  7. Cook D, Walter S, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1998;129:433-440.
  8. Smulders K, van der Hoeven H, Weers-Pothoff I, Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. A randomized clinical trial of intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2002;121:858-862.
  9. Bo H, He L, Qu J. Influence of the subglottic secretion drainage on the morbidity of ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2000;23:472–474.
  10. Kollef MH, Skubas NJ, Sundt TM. A randomized clinical trial of continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions in cardiac surgery patients. Chest. 1999;116:1339-1346.
  11. Valles J, Artigas A, Rello J, et al. Continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1995;122:179-186.
  12. Mahul Ph, Auboyer C, Jospe R, et al. Prevention of nosocomial pneumonia in intubated patients: respective role of mechanical subglottic secretions drainage and stress ulcer prophylaxis. Intensive Care Medicine. 1992;18:20-25.
  13. Dezfulian C, Shojania K, Collard H, et al. Subglottic secretion drainage for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Medicine. 2005;118:11-18.
  14. Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Hospital-acquired, Ventilator-associated, and
    Healthcare-associated Pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine. 2005;171:388-416.
  15. Guidelines for Preventing Health-Care-Associated Pneumonia, 2003, Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. March 26, 2004/53(RR03);1-36.
  16. American Association of Critical Care Nurses. Practice Alert: Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. 2004.
  17. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, et al. Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices. Evidence Report/ Technology Assessment No. 43 (Prepared by the University of California at San Francisco–Stanford Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-97-0013), AHRQ Publication No. 01-E058, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. July 2001.

back to top

 



Download VAP Fact Sheet (PDF)

Randomized, controlled studies highlight the efficacy of CASS.

 

 

© Copyright 2009 Nellcor Puritan Bennett Incorporated. All rights reserved. All trademarks belong to Covidien AG or an affiliate.